SH Sean Harding/blog
Seattle monorail
Monday, March 10th, 2003
monorail
Comments
New camera
Sunday, March 9th, 2003
Carousel

I got a new digital camera to replace my trusty but broken Nikon Coolpix 950. The Coolpix served me well, but the battery door broke (an all too common problem on that model) and I was sick of taping it shut every time I needed to change batteries. I briefly considered trying to fix it; other CP 950 owners have done so successfully. But I decided that this was probably a decent time to upgrade anyway.

I started out with the intention of getting another Nikon. I’ve used Nikon gear for years and I still really like it. However, after looking at all the options, I ended up getting a Canon PowerShot G3. So far I love it. There are reviews of the G3 all over the web, so I won’t write another one. I’ll just say that I am very happy with this camera and leave it at that.

Comments
Thanks a lot, Yoplait
Friday, March 7th, 2003
yo2

I was just sitting there on the couch trying to wake up. Preparing for a day at work (a Friday, at least). Starting to eat some breakfast. And then it happened. The bottom fell out of my cup of Yoplait yogurt. Right into my lap, of course. Thanks, guys.

I think I’ll have some toast for breakfast.

yo1
Comments
Cybersquatters give me a headache
Thursday, March 6th, 2003

For years now, I’ve been wanting the domain "sharding.com." In fact, I only picked up "sharding.org" because I couldn’t have "sharding.com." At the time, it was owned by a real estate agent in Bellevue, Washington (just across Lake Washington from here). A few months ago, I noticed that the expiration date for the domain was approaching quickly. That had happened before; the previous year, the owner came within days of it expiring before they renewed. But I kept an eye on the status, in hopes of getting my hands on the domain.

The expiration date came and went. This, of course, doesn’t mean it was actually available. It went into the "REDEMPTIONPERIOD" limbo for a few months. Then it went into the "PENDINGDELETE" status and I was poised to grab it. I seriously considered signing up for a service like Snapnames to better my chances, but I decided that it wasn’t worth $70 to me. Anyway, I didn’t think it would be a terribly popular domain. It isn’t especially short, and it’s not a single dictionary word.

Unfortunately, I lost that gamble. Late last night, a company in Hong Kong called "Vertical Axis" registered the domain before I had a chance. My assumption was that they were a cybersquatter of some sort. My impression of them was not helped by the fact that they have Javascript trying to open a popup window in their whois record (it doesn’t do anything to me since I run whois on the command line, but it’s still sleazy). A little research turned up a complaint against them for squatting on another domain. Now my only hope is that they let it expire at the end of the one year registration. And then it’s back to the beginning of the process.

This has been a frustrating experience, mostly because of the way the registrars do things. They give you no way to tell exactly when a domain will become available. In fact, I believe that they intentionally make it impossible to determine, though I don’t have any proof of that. It feels like the playing field isn’t level. I don’t know that Vertical Axis cheated. They may just have better processes in place for grabbing domains instantly as they expire, or they may have simply gotten lucky. But I do feel like I never had a chance. According to the data I got from whois, the domain went from being in PENDINGDELETE status to being owned by Vertical Axis in a matter of less than 20 minutes. Unless I was checking whois every 10 seconds, there’s no way I could have gotten in (and even then, it wouldn’t be a sure thing).

Maybe next time I’ll just shovel $70 into someone’s pocket by signing up for Snapnames. It’s not a solution I like, but it may be the only way to have a chance.

Comments
If it sounds too good to be true…
Monday, March 3rd, 2003

Have you ever considered ordering a camera via mail order? Ever looked at those ads in the back of photography magazines and gawked at the amazing deals? I think it’s fairly common knowledge that many of those advertisers are a little less than honest. They may try to sell you hundreds of dollars of unnecessary accessories, they might send you grey market goods or maybe they’ll just tell you that what you want is out of stock for the next three months. Nevertheless, I always wonder about these places. Are they just run by some guy sitting in his basement or what?

Don Wiss has helped to shed some light on what these places are, or at least what their "storefronts" look like. He has a bunch of photos of the various Brooklyn and Manhattan mail order photography companies’ physical locations. It’s quite an eye opener for anyone who has ever considred buying from one of them.

Comments
< Newer posts | Home | Older posts >